Program Concentration: U.S. History


            The study of history should be rich and varied. In fact, California’s  Common Core Standards (2010) encourage a move away from the standard secondary history textbook to more complex and varied materials. The selections in my program area concentration have reacquainted me with the diversity of source material as well as with the value of secondary sources that delve into a single topic. For example, Keyssar’s (2009) examination of the history of voting rights in The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States, paired with Kerber’s (1999) No Constitution Right to be Ladies, provided a depth of insight into voting and rights to representation barely touched upon in a traditional textbook.
Meat-packing plant, L.C. McClure 1900-1920?
Typical U.S. History textbooks look at the study of history with a long, wide lens to capture the essence of much, but the detail of nothing. For example, McDougall-Littell’s “The Americans” (Danzer, 2006), discusses the impact of Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” in a mere four paragraphs spread over more than 10 pages, while Davidson and Lytle (2000), in After the Fact: The Art of Historical Detection, Volume 2, devote a 28-page chapter to the discussion. President Theodore Roosevelt, according to the account in “The Americans” (Danzer, 2006), was “nauseated by Sinclair’s account” (p. 317) of conditions in the meatpacking industry. The gist of the remainder of the account is that Roosevelt appointed a commission, the commission issued a “scathing” (Danzer, 2006, p. 320) report, Roosevelt pushed for passage of corrective legislation, and it was passed, albeit gutted with the meatpackers coming out of the ordeal not required to pay for inspections or label their tinned meats with packing date information. The account is tepid at best and does not make explicit connections to other social issues of the time.
Man butchering meat, Chicago, IL, Chicago Daily News, 1904.
            Davidson and Lytle’s (2000) account, on the other hand, provide rich insight into the event from a political historian’s point of view. They also provide additional background about “The Jungle” that is missing from textbooks such as “The Americans” (Danzer, 2006). For example, Davidson and Lytle (2000) point out that author Upton Sinclair was a socialist, and, in the early 1900s, Americans were generally distrustful of socialists. Further, Davidson and Lytle (2000) point out that there had been numerous stories written about the meatpacking industry so “The Jungle” was merely the straw that broke the camel’s back of public outrage. Perhaps even more significant is that “The Americans” (Danzer, 2006) does not place “The Jungle” within the context of the journalistic era in which it was written; it would be useful for students to know that the novel was written at a time when sensationalized stories packed full of lurid detail got the most press.
            This richness of historical storytelling not only makes the story more interesting, but also provides students with the opportunity to critique authors and sources for credibility and validity, in ways such as those required by California’s CCSS (2010). However, over the past decade teachers have generally moved away from lessons that include critique and, instead, focused more on the demands of mandated testing.
            These courses, as a whole, have given me insight into the content journey that secondary educators need to take to align their lessons to the CCSS.

Works Cited:
California Department of Education, (2010). California's common core content
            standards  for english language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science,
            and technical subjects. Retrieved from website:

Danzer, G. (2006). The americans: Reconstruction to the 21st century. Evanston,
IL: McDougall Littell.

Davidson, J., & Lytle, M. (2000). After the fact: The art of historical detection.
(4th ed., Vol. 2). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Kerber, L. (1999). No constitutional right to be ladies. New York, NY: Hill and
            Wang.

Keyssar, A. (2009). The right to vote: The contested history of democracy in the
            united states. New York, NY: Basic Books.